Re: Some thoughts regarding DW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
<disclaimer>
~ I wasn't involved with the thread or discussion in question
</disclaimer>
on 16/8/05 1:45 PM Jutta Wrage said the following:
| The problem is, if it needs hours of discussion, just to change the
| page and make it accessible again, that really sucks, Everyone can see:
| Oh, lynx does not work, we have a problem - if one accepts that being a
| problem. Either we want accesibilty, and then we do not discuss about
| nothing going wrong or we do not and just take lynx in concern. There
| are several reasons, why some people have to use lynx.
Perhaps the need for a 'very long discussion' is that some people are
very interested about accessibility and web standards and any quirks may
be an interesting point of discussion to a certain breed of geek?
| If you cannot see, why the need of a very long discussion about that
| might hurt people extremly, I cannot do anything by that.
I don't understand why it 'might hurt people extremely' - it got fixed,
people had a discussion about it. Why is that extremely hurtful?
I may just lacking information about the original discussion and that's
why I don't understand it, but if it was fixed, I don't see the problem.
- - Penny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDAWZDGHUSCqMOwisRAv8sAKChbUQjqGku8GljJvzYM27QC1A1UACeLCFb
+8kNxiewWVl+kKaz0RYwW6M=
=PTCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: