Re: Clarification on the relocation of top-level wiki pages to the LocalGroups/ namespace
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:27:49AM +0900, Jongmin Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:41:28AM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-08-06 at 13:36 +0900, Jongmin Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I understand that most local groups are in the LocalGroups/ namespace,
> > > as it is the desinated location. And now I can see that some more local
> > > group pages are being moved from the top level to LocalGroups/:
<snip>
> > > Is it necessary for a local group to be placed under the LocalGroups/
> > > namespace instead of using a top-level page and adding an entry to
> > > LocalGroups/?
> >
> > Would it be preferred to put these pages on the top level and add
> > CategoryLocalGroups?
> >
> > Currently, the reasoning behind putting pages under the LocalGroups
> > namespace is to allow things like dynamic listing and group related
> > pages together, but a category would also achieve the same thing. It's a
> > matter of choosing one of these approaches so we can ensure all the
> > pages consistently follow this convention (i.e. do we move everything
> > into LocalGroups/, or move everything out and add a category to all of
> > them?)
>
> Although I am not very involved in LocalGroups yet, as one of the local
> groups, I prefer the latter option (placing pages at the top level and
> adding CategoryLocalGroups). It is easier for us to advertise our wiki
> page verbally and for people to access it.
<snip>
I believe https://deb.li/DebianKorea could be a http redirect to
https://wiki.debian.org/LocalGroups/DebianKorea ; see
https://wiki.debian.org/deb.li for some documentation of this redirect service.
HTH! Bye,
Joost
Reply to: