[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Use of rewriting in a debian package



On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 18:38 +0200, sean finney wrote:
> hey uwe,
> 
> On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:48 +0200, Uwe Steinmann wrote:
> > Question: Is there any way to make the virtual host inherit the
> > Rewrite rules? I don't want to put 'RewriteOption inherit' into
> > the virtual host. I'd rather prefer a solution without manual
> > intervention.
> 
> unfortunately, the only "way" i can think of is to file a bug against to
> the apache maintainers asking for a way :(
> 
> this is actually one symptom of a larger problem, that being that
> there's no way to provide vhost-specific configuration for the
> predefined vhost.  the webapps-common package will eventually cover this
> problem (the virtualhosts it creates have an Include directive pointing
> to a vhost-specific location), but this package is still alpha-ish in
> nature and i haven't even unleashed it upon experimental.

Hola Sean!

The fact that it includes stuff to support such a situation suggests
that it should _not_ be put into experimental, it should be unleashed
upon 'unstable' immediately.

I seem to recall discussing this at Debconf6 and that even Manoj was of
the opinion that this should happen.  Now.  Well, then, actually, since
that was back in May...

When can we look forward to a release which we can usably depend on, and
which we can all improve in parallel, rather than waiting on your
solitary search for perfection.

:^)
					Andrew.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net .NZ  Ltd,  PO Box 11-053, Manners St,  Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/            PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)803-2201      MOB: +64(272)DEBIAN      OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
                        Chicken Little was right.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: