On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 12:21:04PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > hi Bill, > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 12:10:53AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Ballot Option > > ============= > > > > 1) The Debian project decide against changing its voting process at this > > time. > > > > 2) General resolutions that probe developpers opinions about non-technical issues > > outside the social contract are discouraged. > > > > Rationale > > ========= > > > > So far no voting scheme that preserve both the integrity of the vote and > > the secret of the vote have been proposed. The scheme used for DPL > > election does not provide plausible deniability. > > > > 2. is not made a hard requirement so that it need not be adjudicated by > > the Debian secretary. However most of the developers that seconded the first > > ballot of GR 2021_002 were experienced developers that would be have been > > able to heed the recommendation given in this GR. > > seems I missed your ballot proposal when I suggested mine in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2022/03/msg00021.html > (Message-id: [🔎] YiHtKyWt2LhDLGVV@layer-acht.org>), I'm sorry and I'm blaming > information overload everywhere, which is why I'm behind in catching up on > reading @-vote. > Anyway, how do we proceed here? We should merge them! Maybe you could suggest a new wording ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballombe@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature