Re: Secret Ballots: How Secret
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <email@example.com> writes:
Russ> [*] I do want to acknowledge, however, that having the
Russ> *capability* for verification even if almost no one uses it
Russ> routinely does provide real protection against shenanigans,
Russ> since it means should anyone suspect shenanigans a bunch of
Russ> people can go back and verify their votes even if they didn't
Russ> initially, provided they retained the necessary information.
Russ> -- Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org)
That's why I'm comfortable with the DPL approach.
I doubt people do verifications regularly, but I bet there would be a
lot more verifications happening if the results were surprising or
especially if someone claimed their verification had failed.