[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft proposal for resolution process changes



* Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> [2021-09-28 09:24]:
Thank you, this is a good idea.  The advance reference to withdrawal is
exactly why I didn't do that originally, but on further reflection I think
it's fine.  I now have as A.1.7:

7. The default option has no proposer or sponsors, and cannot be amended
  or withdrawn.

and dropped the point that was A.2.4.
In this context,

    6.3.1.3. If all ballot options are withdrawn, the process is canceled.

is slightly ambiguous, as the default option is technically also a ballot
option. Maybe change it to "If all proposed ballot options…"?

For that reason, I would also change 6.3.1.2 to read "Any member of the
Technical Committee may *propose* additional ballot options", which
also makes it consistent with the phrasing in A.1.1.2

Cheers
Timo

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: