[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to leverage money to accomplish high impact Debian projects



Quoting Gard Spreemann (2021-03-23 16:18:10)
> 
> Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > On 2021-03-22 16 h 43, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> >> Le vendredi, 19 mars 2021, 17.49:54 h CET Louis-Philippe Véronneau 
> >> a écrit :
> >>> On 2021-03-19 08 h 02, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >>>>> I've been telling a few people last month that I would really 
> >>>>> liked to have an Enterprise Edition Online MiniDebConf, 
> >>>>> unfortunately I don't have any time/energy to instigate that 
> >>>>> currently.
> >>>>
> >>>> Something for a Debian fellow that we could hire ;-)
> >>>
> >>> I for one would be less motivated to help with videoteam tasks if 
> >>> I knew someone was paid to organise a miniconf.
> >> 
> >> Would your motivation also be affected if an individual was paid 
> >> only for a specific task that noone in the team found particularily 
> >> interesting to do?
> >> 
> >> (I don't know much about how the videoteam works, so I don't know 
> >> if that's a good example, but let's see…) For example, what if 
> >> someone (paid) handled the storage and timely shipping of all the 
> >> hardware, as well as the actual ordering of new hardware, leaving 
> >> the (what I assume is the more interesting part) configuring, 
> >> design and conception of the system to volunteers?
> >
> > I'm not opposed to paid labor per-say. I think the previous examples 
> > of Debian paying TOs to do accounting is a good one.
> >
> > So to answer your question, I wouldn't be opposed if we contracted 
> > an enterprise to handle our gear for us.
> >
> > I don't think it's something particularly fun to do and I see that 
> > more as an administrative task, akin to accounting.
> >
> > "Organising a miniconf" isn't though.
> 
> Is there a fundamental difference between paying someone to do 
> "non-fun administrative tasks" like accounting, and paying someone to 
> help out with orphaned/RFA'd packages (cf. Christian Kastner's recent 
> "How to motivate contributors to work on QA" question)?
> 
> It seems to me, to some extent, that a package that is orphaned or 
> RFA'd is per definition "not fun enough" for a volunteer to work on.

Accounting is a mandatory activity regardless of its fun-factor.

Seems backwards to to me to pay for keeping packages alive that we have 
lost interest in.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: