On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 09:50:41AM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 23:06:55 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > another option would be 'unstable-proposed' (or whatever) where packages get
> > uploaded to, and which only gets moved to 'unstable' if they don't fail piuparts,
> > autopkgtests (plain build tests) and so forth...
> Do you mean this to be for all package, like Ubuntu does (they run the
> unstable->testing migration with a 0-day delay, all packages get uploaded
> into the equivalent of unstable, and users of their development branch
> are actually getting the equivalent of testing), or do you mean just for
> source-NEW and/or binary-NEW packages?
for all, including *-NEW. why should ftpmaster/anyone look at a package which
fails automated test? (well, anyone except the maintainers of said package.)
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature