Le 04/12/2019 à 22:43, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:11:49 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
>> gregor herrmann writes ("Re: Reframing"):
>>> So yes, for me a combination of options G and D would be (or maybe
>>> more accurately: would have been ) helpful in finalizing my ranking
>>> of the options given my ambivalence.
>>
>> To make it concrete I am going to post texts of those two options. If
>> people come forward to say they support or or both of them I will
>> formally propose them tomorrow morning (in the hope that the Secretary
>> and/or the DPL will allow them on the ballot). If you support either
>> of these options enough, then please formally propose it yourself and
>> I will second it tomorrow.
>
> Thank you for your work on this!
>
> I think I would support the G+D combination but given Kurt's mails
> from this evening [0] it looks like this ship has sailed, and I will
> now follow your example and spend the time before going to bed with
> something more enjoyable than reading -vote and thinking the options
> through.
>
>
> Cheers,
> gregor
Seconded
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature