Re: My analysis of the proposals

[Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala@pp1.inet.fi>]

On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 19:29 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Sysvinit has worked for over 20 years. Yes, it has warts, but the warts

> I therefore disagree in the strongest terms to make this be about the
> position of sysvinit, except in so far as it is part of an abstract
> group of "not systemd" options that we are trying to decide upon.

I don't understand what point you're trying to make. My point was that
what actual conflict there is, is in practice conflict between those
who want to stay with sysvinit, and those who want to use systemd; and
therefore the most practically important part of a resolution is how it
would apply to sysvinit support. Your message first contains a defense
of sysvinit, then a claim that "therefore" it should not be considered
to be about sysvinit. I don't see how that "therefore" would logically
follow.