Re: Proposal: Reaffirm our commitment to support portability and multiple implementations
>>>>> "Bdale" == Bdale Garbee <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Bdale> Guillem Jover <email@example.com> writes:
>> I think the current GR is incorrectly framing the problem at
>> hand, as if it was just an init system selection.
Bdale> This resonates with me, but...
>> I'm thus proposing the following:
Bdale> I find this really appealing as a higher-level statement of
Bdale> values and intent, but unfortunately, I don't think the text
Bdale> does anything to help resolve the problems that Sam set out
Bdale> to try and tackle with this GR.
Bdale> I therefore find myself unwilling to second it, even though
Bdale> on some level I would really like to.
I concur with Bdale and Russ. If this option wins I find that I
wouldn't know how to go forward. I started this process because there
were issues coming before me as DPL that I didn't know how to address
because I didn't understand the direction of the project.
This issue gives no guidance on the sorts of issues that I and the
policy editors are facing. This option provides no guidance on how to
approach the patterns of behavior that Ian and I have seen on our lists.