[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Review of proposals


On Fri 29 Nov 2019 at 10:00PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Speaking as one of the Policy editors, personally I'd rather have the
> explicit time frame so that we don't have to argue about what "enough
> time" means.  I like Ian's explicit list, which preempts a lot of the
> expected arguments.

Speaking as the other Policy Editor, I concur.  Ian's proposal is a
powerful compromise because of its preemption of certain points of

For similar reasons, I don't think that Guillem's new proposal is
sufficient to answer the project's current needs.

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: