[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please drop/replace the use of the term "diversity"

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:54:40PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:27:13AM +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > May I gently request we replace the use of the word "diversity"
> > throughout the "init systems and systemd" General Resolution prior to
> > it being subject to a plebiscite?
> Thanks for raising this issue, and yes, please!
> Something like s/init diversity/support for multiple init systems/
> seems to me to address the issue you raise, introduce more clarity, and
> it sounds to me also somewhat more precise. For example:
>   Choice 1: Support for multiple init systems is Important
>   Choice 2: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives
>   Choice 3: Focus on systemd for init system and other facilities
>   Choice 4: Support non-systemd systems, without blocking progress
>   Choice 5: Support for multiple init systems is Required

I've updated choice 1 and 5 like that.

Note that the text of choice 1, 2 and 3 still mention it:
"our current position on Init systems, Init system diversity, and the use of
systemd facilities."


Reply to: