Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)"):
> * Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>, 2016-09-20, 16:47:
> >5. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary.
> 
> s/5/6/

Indeed.  Kurt, could you please note this numbering fix (to "correct a
minor error" under A.1.6) ?  That is, the 2nd of the two paragraphs
numbered 5 shoudl be numbered 6.

Sorry for reposting the proposal without fixing the numbering, even
though I do now remember noticing it (and even commenting on it)
earlier.

Thanks,
Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJX4wuIAAoJEOPjOSNItQ05WVUH/1260RnOD+hk85MZXu5OzjJY
EsQTodg9o0OpW+Voz/eTL7Y6ZL59Ju6SlfQQFZswmZMIVUilfvTh75BQ0ImYy2Z9
gfh71QMNROkUn1B7RRrbbH0clWMs/gHIQkHSWJRK0uD4w73n67x36lsuh51rJN/M
XJJRWZSMvSp/h2gsqRmE50mfzlo+BjxfCC3DLT0TD7PpLCfwbxm5jpR+1oxUzC8x
BzIslaThVm1jSxumOMn5a/Yjel4rr+b9GU3YOVUxdy2s8TCIBYDkTuiep8Dv0lGL
T9YyMGwwYe53e7+dYjeImspWobFhlV+FKhJHIXBVQXEyRsokmmMVpFaSw24v6Y4=
=05n0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.