Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, at 16:15, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so, as previously announced I hereby like to propose to hold another GR
> to revert the decission of
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002.en.html as the last 11 years
> have shown, that noone is willing to do the work and that it would be
> very difficult up to impractical or unethical, as too many people writing
> on debian-private do no allow declassification of their contributions.
>
> Despite the results of https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_002 I think
> we should vote on three options:
>
> a.) we want to declassify debian-private@l.d.o
> b.) we give up on this and revert
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2005/vote_002.en.html
> c.) further discussion.
>
> I don't think omitting option a.) is a good idea, even though we just
> voted that we prefer c.) over a.) ;-)
>
> I'm hereby looking for people seconding this proposal so the secretary
> can start the voting process properly.
Seconded.
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware,
fast DNS(SEC) resolver
Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Potřeby pro pečení chleba
všeho druhu
> Last and least, *please* respect the reply-to: header and *do not* send
> your reply to -private nor -project. (And I'm not subscribed to
> debian-vote@ldo).
If only Fastmail allowed that :(, argh.
Reply to: