Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Gunnar Wolf writes ("Re: GR proposal: give up on declassifying debian-private (Re: General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results)"):
> Ian Jackson dijo [Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:43:43PM +0100]:
> > Do I need to re-make my proposal as an amendment to Gunnar's or are
> > you happy to treat it as such ?
> 
> FWIW I think we will be better off if we have it as a distinct option
> (as it is semantically quite different).

Sorry, yes, that's what I mean.  But formally there is one GR with a
number of different options, each of which is a technically an
amendment.  (The process has this so that there is a defined person
who decides when to call a vote - in this case, you.)

But right now if my proposal gets enough seconds, technically there
might be two separate GRs, which would be silly.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.