[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal, Call for Seconds - term limit for the tech-ctte

]] Philip Hands 

> Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@err.no> writes:
> > ]] Stefano Zacchiroli 
> >
> >> I'm hereby formally submitting the GR proposal included below between
> >> dashed double lines, and calling for seconds.  With respect to past
> >> discussions on the -vote mailing list, this is the proposal code-named
> >> "2-S"; see [1,2] for (the last known versions of) alternative proposals.
> >
> > I like the term limit concept.  I'm wondering if we should have a wider
> > proposal in which we just make the CTTE an elected body.  I'm not sure
> > it's a good idea, but I'm also not sure if it's been discussed at all
> > (only having followed some of the -vote discussions around this from the
> > web archives).
> Wouldn't it have been great if the various factions around the systemd
> issue had got the idea early on to try to stuff the committee with their
> respective friends before the decision.

If we assume four-year terms, that'd have been, at max, two members out
of the eight.

> Personally I think there's more than enough voting going on as it is,
> and adding reasons to have more regular votes will just promote the idea
> (that is already rather hard to dissuade people of) that all one needs to
> do is vote for a thing, and somehow it will magically do itself.

I'm not seeing people having that idea.

> It does not strike me as obvious that popularity correlates to
> competence.  Also, it would not be helpful if members of the committee
> were tempted to take the popular side of an argument, against their
> better judgement, because they were coming to the end of their term, and
> they would like to be reelected.

If that's the only reason, make it so people can sit for a maximum of
one term before being off the committee for a full term and that effect
more or less vanishes.

I'm not saying «We should absolutely have an elected TC», I'm saying
that I think it's something that's worth discussing.

As for Zack's point about this process being underway already: yes,
that's the point.  If we want to change things about the TC, let's put
out a comprehensive proposal instead of changing one thing now and
another thing in six or twelve months.

Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are

Reply to: