[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal, Call for Seconds - term limit for the tech-ctte



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/01/2014 12:20 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Cross post -vote, -project ; M-F-T: to -vote.
> 
> For more background information on the development of this proposal, see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/11/msg00274.html ]
> 
> I'm hereby formally submitting the GR proposal included below between 
> dashed double lines, and calling for seconds.  With respect to past 
> discussions on the -vote mailing list, this is the proposal code-named 
> "2-S"; see [1,2] for (the last known versions of) alternative proposals.
> 
> [1]: https://people.debian.org/~zack/gr-ctte-term-limit/ [2]:
> http://git.upsilon.cc/?p=text/gr-ctte-term-limit.git;a=tree
> 
> ===========================================================================
>
> 
The Constitution is amended as follows:
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
- --- constitution.txt.orig	2014-11-17 18:02:53.314945907 +0100
> +++ constitution.2-S.txt	2014-11-21 16:56:47.328071287 +0100 @@ -299,8
> +299,20 @@ Project Leader may appoint new member(s) until the number of 
> members reaches 6, at intervals of at least one week per appointment. -
> 5. If the Technical Committee and the Project Leader agree they may +    5.
> A Developer is not eligible to be (re)appointed to the Technical +
> Committee if they have been a member within the previous 12 months. +    6.
> If the Technical Committee and the Project Leader agree they may remove or
> replace an existing member of the Technical Committee. +    7. Term limit: 
> +         1. On January 1st of each year the term of any Committee member +
> who has served more than 42 months (3.5 years) and who is one +
> of the two most senior members is set to expire on December +
> 31st of that year. +         2. A member of the Technical Committee is said
> to be more senior +            than another if they were appointed earlier,
> or were appointed +            at the same time and have been a member of
> the Debian Project +            longer. In the event that a member has been
> appointed more +            than once, only the most recent appointment is
> relevant.
> 
> 6.3. Procedure
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  As a transitional measure, if this GR is passed after January 1st, 2015, 
> then the provision of section §6.2.7.1 is taken to have occurred on
> January 1st, 2015. 
> ===========================================================================
>
>  I'd like to thank Anthony Towns for introducing the term limit idea 
> several months ago [3] and for his help in polishing it through several 
> rounds of feedback on the -vote mailing list.
> 
> [3]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/05/threads.html#00054
> 
> Cheers.
> 

seconded

- -- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=aqWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: