[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

Quoting Nikolaus Rath (2014-10-22 05:09:18)
> Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> writes:
>> Q2: support for alternative init systems as PID 1
>> =================================================
>> A2.1: packages MUST work with one alternative init system (in [iwj])
>> (if you are confused with “one” here, it’s basically fine to read it as
>> “sysvinit” instead. See [10]this subthread for a discussion about
>> this)
> I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on 
> uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed 
> by his proposal.

I too find it wrong to interpret Ian's text as a war between systemd and 
sysvinit - that's anything but "basically fine"!

@Ian: I would appreciate if you commented on this.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

Reply to: