Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain

To: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:54:48 +0100
Message-id: <21574.15224.347405.22987@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <20141020184718.GC4987@smurf.noris.de>
References: <20141018102118.GA2021@misc-debomatic1> <20141020181458.GA20641@kitenet.net> <20141020184718.GC4987@smurf.noris.de>

Matthias Urlichs writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain"):
> Really? To me, "For the record, the TC expects" does not introduce
> a ruling.

Precisely.

> It seems to be, rather, a strongly-worded but informal declaration how the
> TC is likely to rule, should a maintainer fail to meet this particular
> expectation.

Indeed.

Ian.

Reply to:

References:
- Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
  - From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
  - From: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [Call for seconds] The ???no GR, please??? amendement.
Next by Date: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Previous by thread: Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Next by thread: Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread