[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> (2014-10-16):
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:24:52 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > As Matthew said, I don't think further lengthy discussion of the
> > > issues is likely to be productive, and therefore hope we can bring
> > > this swiftly to a vote.  This is particularly true given the impact on
> > > the jessie release.
> > Speaking of which,
> >   before deciding anything (including seconding it or not) about this
> > proposal, I'd like to know what impact a positive outcome of this GR
> > would have on the work load of teams whose efforts we badly need to put
> > the Jessie release in shape.
> Secon^WAgreed.
> And let me add a question:
> What does this GR actually mean in practice? Is it about specific
> problems? If yes, which ones (bug numbers)? If not, what else?

My personal hunch would be:


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: