[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)

Philip Hands writes ("Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?)"):
> I'm completely astonished that Ian is willing to suggest that four more
> people pledging support for it at this stage would be enough for him to
> attempt CPR on its putrid corpse.

You put me in an awkward position.  My email was an attempt to get
this discussion shut down on -devel, where it is off-topic and a total
waste of energy.

But your response, using phrases like `dead horse', invites me to list
what I see as continuing provocations (by the victorious camp) which
in my mind make the need for a GR, along the lines proposed by Matthew
earlier in the year, perhaps even more urgent than before.

I'm well aware that I lost the (fixed) vote and that I'm in a minority
and that some of the principles I care about are going to be trampled
into the dust.  There's no need to rub it in quite so much.

(still bitter)

Reply to: