Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:03:19PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> The first one is now:
> ====
> <ol>
> <li>The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for
> participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of
> communication within the project.
>
> <li>Updates to this code of conduct should be made by the DPL or the
> DPL's delegates after consultation with the project, or by the Debian
> Developers as a whole through the general resolution procedure.
>
> <li>The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
> </ol>
>
> It adds the following text at the end of the initial text:
> <pre>
> - The [Mailing list code of
> conduct](http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct) is useful for
> advice specific to Debian mailing lists
> </pre>
> ===
>
> And I understand that your understanding is that the second one should be:
> ===
> <ol>
> <li>The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for
> participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of
> communication within the project.
>
> <li>Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR
> procedure. However, the DPL (or the DPL's delegates) can add or
> remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section
> after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR.
>
> <li>The initial text of the code of conduct follows, in markdown format.
> </ol>
>
> It adds the following text at the end of the initial text:
> <pre>
> - The [Mailing list code of
> conduct](http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct) is useful for
> advice specific to Debian mailing lists
> </pre>
> ===
>
> In which case I should just add the link to the mailling list CoC initial text
> since all options now have that.
Yes, that's what I think should be done. Neil, can you confirm?
--
This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward space you are having a bad problem and you
will not go to space today.
-- http://xkcd.com/1133/
Reply to: