Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
* Wouter Verhelst (email@example.com) [140308 02:21]:
> So rather than accepting this amendment, I propose that we modify
> paragraph 3 read as follows, instead:
> 3. Updates to this code of conduct should follow the normal GR
> procedure. However, the DPL or the DPL's delegates can add or
> remove links to other documents in the "Further reading" section
> after consultation with the project and without requiring a GR.
> The idea here is that a DPL can add a link to something considered
> useful, while "normal" DD's can still add such a link through a GR if
> the DPL is opposed.
> How's that sound?
Just a minor point, I think we should put the "or the DPL's delegates"
in () because according to the constitution the DPL could delegate
these powers anyways (and so this part is just repeating what our
constitution says, and not something special for this decision here).