Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"):
> > There is also this decision of the CTTE:
> > The TC chooses to not pass a resolution at the current time
> > about whether software may require specific init systems.
> > Which doesn't have this GR rider text in it, and is on the same
> > subject as this GR.
> That doesn't contradict the GR. If the GR passes we have two
> 11th Feb as modified by GR: sysvinit as default, loose coupling
The result of that CT decision is that systemd is the default.
The intend of this GR is not to change the default.