Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:01:16AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"):
> > This is probably going to require a 2:1 majority requirement as
> > written.
> Do you agree that the intent can be achieved by something requiring a
> 1:1 majority ? If so, can you please say how.
> If you're going to say we need to replace "the TC resolution is
> amended" with something like "we wish that instead the TC had decided
> blah", then please reconsider. That would force the GR to avoid
> saying what its own effect is, which is unnecessarily confusing.
> Also, writing that text is very cumbersome.
The text currently says it's using the TC's power to decide
something, and so would fall under 4.1.4. I think the intent of
this GR is not to override the TC's decision about the default, so
I'm currently not sure what to suggest.