Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
* Iain Lane (firstname.lastname@example.org) [140302 19:28]:
> The rest of the discussion notwithstanding, where do you think that
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > […]
> > That doesn't contradict the GR. If the GR passes we have two
> > resolutions:
> > 11th Feb as modified by GR: sysvinit as default, loose coupling
> sysvinit comes from?
I think a qualified spelling error, and should read as "systemd as
default, loose coupling".