Joachim Breitner wrote: > How about reversing the action: By default, there is an election, unless > a reasonable, well-defined number of DD publicly state that they see no > need for a re-election. A variant on this that would not be susceptable to this: > I think this works well unless we have the case of a strongly polarizing > DPL, with a large number of supporters and possibly more opponents. ... Would perhaps be to have people state that they are only interested in a pro-forma election. If there's a consensus that the current DPL is well respected and should continue, then we could skip strawman candidates, DPL platforms, Q&A sessions, etc. (If NOTA wins, the consensus was false and we have to try again.) -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature