[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rationale for GRs

[Matthew Vernon]
> I would like to propose, therefore, the requirement that anyone
> proposing a GR be required to provide a short (no more than, say, 500
> words) summary of why they believe the GR to be necessary. A similar
> requirement would apply to those proposing an amendment.

If the rationale is a required part of a GR, should it be treated as
normative or informative?  In other words, if I agree with the text of
a GR, but disagree with its posted rationale, am I supposed to vote for
or against it?
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/

Reply to: