On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:39:27AM +1100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> But all that aside, GSoC still gets some "flames" on Debian lists; see
> the thread on -devel from about this time last year, eg:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00424.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00431.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00441.html
FWIW, I believe the above flames (which match those I remember having
ever had about GSoC) are in a quite different field than those we had
about Dunc-Tank.
The main criticism to GSoC we had within the project is that it should
not be used to support student which are already involved in Debian as
DDs and/or DMs. That is a criticism I personally share. GSoC is about
getting new blood in the project; hiring students which are already
involved in the project pretty much defeats that purpose.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature