On Fri May 01 11:56, Don Armstrong wrote: > > So I don't really see what we should vote on unless someone > > disagrees with above interpretations? > > The only question resides with the effect of passing such position > statements. Without modifying foundation documents or the > constitution, they are effectively non-binding advisory statements > when operating within areas that are the remit of foundation documents > or the constitution. Indeed and there is the case of temporary exceptions. Does saying "we will release with non-free stuff" involve modifying a foundation document? I would say yes. Does saying "we will release Lenny with non-free stuff" involve modifying a foundation document? There seems to be less agreement on this. I think it does, but the previous discussion showed that some people disagree. Anyway, I'm going to try and push that discussion a bit more in a couple of hours, so probably best to discuss in that context -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature