Overriding vs Amending vs Position statement

[Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>]

Hi

There seem to be some disagreements about the terms in the subject. As 
far as I'm concerned it's pretty clear though and would not need any 
vote to clarify:

Overriding is only used in combination with decisions. You cannot 
override a document or its interpretation/meaning. You can only override 
a DD's (or delegate's) decision.

Amending is changing something written like a foundation document or a 
proposal. As far as I can see you can only amend explicitly so there 
should be no confusion.

A position statement is a decided on proposal that clarifies the 
position of the Debian project, but does not explicitly amend a 
foundation document.

Supersession of a Foundation Document is replacing a Foundation Document 
with another version: introduce a new one, ammend one or remove one.

According to the Debian Constitution there is only a 3:1 majority needed 
to ammend the Constitution or supersede a Foundation Document.

So I don't really see what we should vote on unless someone disagrees 
with above interpretations?

Cheers

Luk