Please respect list policies and don't duplicate mails. On 17/03/2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I thought all RC bugs were supposed to have severity "serious" or > higher. Has that been changed? RC != RG. > > You don't read debian-devel-announce, do you? > > Of course I do. What I said was that I must have missed the > announcement. Then please refer (again) to e.g.: 479CFD77.2070104@debian.org 877igkrf1f.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de 47CCF6CE.7050004@debian.org > And what exactly does this have to do with the technical committee? No idea. It looks like it all started with 20080316233320.GP23187@mails.so.argh.org, and since you're still wondering about RC/RG bugs, I'm answering these questions. -- Cyril Brulebois
Attachment:
pgpM0yk0Viof4.pgp
Description: PGP signature