Re: Technical committee resolution
* Thomas Bushnell BSG (tb@becket.net) [080317 00:24]:
>
> On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 00:13 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG (tb@becket.net) [080316 21:01]:
> > > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 04:29 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > > The creiteria can be more than just voting on issues -- look for
> > > > number of emails on threads on a issue raised, number of emails sent to
> > > > the bug report, number of "fact finding" or "research" or survey or
> > > > report mails in that mix.
> > >
> > > Quite right: that's why I suggested that if someone has failed to vote
> > > or contribute twice, they should be replaceable at the option of the
> > > DPL.
> >
> > I would prefer if people would fix their release goal / critical bugs
> > instead of preparing complex arguments how to change the tech ctte at
> > places where it is not broken.
>
> I see; so there are no members of the technical committee who have
> failed twice to vote?
I'm not sure how not voting twice in a row makes someone a less
important contributor by definition.
But I would really prefer if you would fix your own packages instead of
relaying on our BSPers.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: