Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification
* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho (firstname.lastname@example.org) [081117 18:02]:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:50:50PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > And who is going to modify it if the original vote does not include a
> > wording?
> If a vote supersedes a part of a foundation document but does not specify
> editing instructions, I believe the only correct thing to do is to add the
> actual decision as an addendum to the original document (like the US does with
> its constitutional amendments).
> A later vote could then decide to strike that addendum and incorporate it in
> the document as a change in wording, but that's just cosmetics.
Even though I think this is ugly, I agree that this is the correct way
to handle it.