Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification
On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Josselin Mouette [Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:38:43 +0100]:
>> Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 14:05 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
>> > This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded.
>> The Secretary made it clear that if your proposal wins, the SC *will* be
>> Therefore I think we should decide on a new wording before the vote
>> instead of letting someone else decide on it.
> Can the SC be modified without a second vote?
I don't see why we need a second 3:1 vote on a foundation
document after having a 3:1 vote that supersedes part of it.
Before destruction a man's heart is haughty, but humility goes before
honour. Psalms 18:12
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C