Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:32:33 -0600]:
> On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Josselin Mouette [Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:38:43 +0100]:
> >> Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 14:05 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> >> > This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded.
> >> The Secretary made it clear that if your proposal wins, the SC *will* be
> >> amended.
> >> Therefore I think we should decide on a new wording before the vote
> >> instead of letting someone else decide on it.
> > Can the SC be modified without a second vote?
> I don't see why we need a second 3:1 vote on a foundation
> document after having a 3:1 vote that supersedes part of it.
And who is going to modify it if the original vote does not include a
wording?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Joaquín Sabina - A la orilla de la chimenea
Reply to: