Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 01:24:56PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:48:44AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> No it's really not funny. I'm sick of reading ad nauseam your opinion.
> > Then don't read it. Me, I'm sick of reading personal attacks, but I
> > choose to read anyway out of responsibility.
> If you're sick of personal attacks, stop this bullshit and spend your
> time on something useful.
This seems to suggest that personal attacks are well deserved because I didn't
spend my time the way _you_ find useful.
On one hand, I spend my time the way I find useful myself, and I will continue
to do so. Sorry if that bothers you.
On the other, personally attacking someone because of the way he's chosen to
deal with his free time reflects a rather weak standpoint, and lack of real
> To start the same bullshit again for the next release, a few days before
> the release?
No, it started years before the release. I only stepped in when it became
clear that the bugs were being ignored. Stop pretending there was no time
- #494010 was known since 2006.
- #493925, #494007, #494308 were known since 2004.
The first response in #494308 is a jewel:
I already waited for this.
You don't expect us to remove the e100 driver, do you?
They're so few words, but they tell so many things. It's the perfect summary.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."