[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny

Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <alexander@schmehl.info> writes:

> Andreas Barth schrieb:
>> In case any of the proposals get enough seconds, I would propose then:
>> | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade them
>> | against each other. However during getting an release out of the door,
>> | decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the high
>> | quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to
>> | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknoledge that there
>> | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release team
>> | are working at.
>> | 
>> | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
>> | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
>> | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
>> | authorize these decisions.
> Should you need to propose this, consider it seconded by me.
> Should you do a s/acknoledge/acknowledge/ and/or s/therefor/therefore/
> I'll still second it.

I second both Andreas Barth's proposal with and without Alexander's
proposed corrections.

Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

Attachment: pgpvoXE8YOtYh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: