[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny


On Monday 03 November 2008 19:08, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Andreas Barth schrieb:
> > In case any of the proposals get enough seconds, I would propose then:
> > | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade
> > | them against each other. However during getting an release out of the
> > | door, decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the
> > | high quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to
> > | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknoledge that there is
> > | more than just one minefield our core developers and the release team
> > | are working at.
> > |
> > | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
> > | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
> > | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
> > | authorize these decisions.
> Should you need to propose this, consider it seconded by me.
> Should you do a s/acknoledge/acknowledge/ and/or s/therefor/therefore/
> I'll still second it.

I second both Andreas Barth's proposal with and without Alexander's
proposed corrections.


Attachment: pgpS049EciQX4.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: