Re: Call for seconds: DFSG violations in Lenny
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Andreas Barth schrieb:
>> In case any of the proposals get enough seconds, I would propose then:
>> | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade them
>> | against each other. However during getting an release out of the door,
>> | decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the high
>> | quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to
>> | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknoledge that there
>> | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release team
>> | are working at.
>> | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow
>> | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making
>> | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary
>> | authorize these decisions.
> Should you need to propose this, consider it seconded by me.
And by me.
> Should you do a s/acknoledge/acknowledge/ and/or s/therefor/therefore/
> I'll still second it.
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----