Re: Draft ballot for Proceedural Vote: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I find it mildly entertaining that this vote did not take place
> because apparently it takes "a couple of days, [...] and sometimes
> longer" [0] to set up an "immediate" vote. I'm sure there were
> very good reasons [1] to not rush things in this particular case.
>
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00203.html
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/10/msg00226.html
Mind you, I am not runing this vote anyway. So the fact i
consider it useless, no-op, anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose
whatsoever, except to kill any motivation ganneff might have had to
facilitate admission of non-packagers into Debian, has absolutely
nothing to say about what the person running this vote thinks about it.
manoj
--
What do you have when you have six lawyers buried up to their necks in
sand? Not enough sand.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: