[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds - DC concept (was: Possible amendment for Debian Contributors concept)



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:01:51PM +0000, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> 
> > I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> > so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
> 
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
> 
> |   The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are not
> |   working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not provided by
> |   the project with as much help as might be possible, useful or required, nor
> |   opportunities to join the project.
> |
> |   We thank Joerg Jaspert for exploring ideas on how to involve contributors more
> |   closely with and within the project so that they can get both recognition and
> |   the necessary tools to do their work.
> |
> |   We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce mailinglist is
> |   not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large part of our
> |   community. We invite the DAM and all the contributors to further develop their
> |   ideas in close coordination with other members of the project, and to present a
> |   new and improved proposal on the project's mailinglists in the future.
> |
> |   Significant changes should only be implemented after consensus within
> |   the project at large has been reached, or when decided by a general
> |   resolution.

I'm still a bit sorry that Joerg doesn't rescind his first mail by
himself and starts that by himself also, and that we need to go down the
GR route... But since it doesn't seem like an available option right
now, let's say

I second this.


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgp2xQ6Lg41TA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: