[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds - DC concept (was: Possible amendment for Debian Contributors concept)

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:01:51PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
> |   The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are not
> |   working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not provided by
> |   the project with as much help as might be possible, useful or required, nor
> |   opportunities to join the project.
> |
> |   We thank Joerg Jaspert for exploring ideas on how to involve contributors more
> |   closely with and within the project so that they can get both recognition and
> |   the necessary tools to do their work.
> |
> |   We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce mailinglist is
> |   not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large part of our
> |   community. We invite the DAM and all the contributors to further develop their
> |   ideas in close coordination with other members of the project, and to present a
> |   new and improved proposal on the project's mailinglists in the future.
> |
> |   Significant changes should only be implemented after consensus within
> |   the project at large has been reached, or when decided by a general
> |   resolution.


Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: