Re: Draft ballot for Proceedural Vote: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.

[Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:49:33PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >  
> > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192
> > > [   ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided
> > > [   ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided
> > > [   ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > What does "Further discussion" mean in the context of this vote? I think 
> > there should be no "Further discussion" on the ballot, as it is not clear 
> > what would happen if "Further discussion" wins. Would the decision still 
> > be suspended or not?
> > 
> 
> If Further discussion wins, the decision remains delayed[0]. I thought
> about removing it, but it's inclusion serves as a 'I abstain' or a 'I
> think this vote is rubbish' or similar.
> I can either drop it, or include a bit of text in the ballot about what
> outcomes mean if you like.
> 
> Neil
> 
> [0] It's delayed at the moment. This is a vote to override that
> essentially.

So what is the difference between 2 and 3?  In case of 2 we already
agree to have an other GR?


Kurt