[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question to all candidates: Perceived hostility within the community



On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:52:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:41:09PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> > > There is nothing like a moral right to mock people, just like there is
> > > nothing like a moral right not to be mocked.
> > 
> > Research[1] has shown that one of the primary factors deterring women
> > from involvement in free software is the perceived hostility of many of
> > the communities. Do candidates believe that mocking of other members of
> > the project is acceptable[2],
> 
> Generally, no. However, in any sufficiently large community it *will*
> happen; and I do not think that flaming people because one feels mocked
> is acceptable, either.

  For the record I don't think flaming mockery is acceptable. Sometimes
mockery is used to make a reproach with some humour. I mean mockery in
the "use some derision" sense, not the "insulting" sense. It offers to
the mocked guy (or girl) to answer with a joke as well, but take the
remark into account.

  Though it means that one shall have some humour sense, a bit of
hindsight about oneself, and a fair amount of self-derision.  For the
record I prefer a lot to be mocked, it offers a decent exit: answering
with a joke. Whereas direct criticism is often less easy to deal with:
answers tend to be a long apology or excuses mail, and it's way more
humiliating. And if you disagree with the criticism, it often degenerate
in a flame, because you felt attacked, and it will generate a flame.
With a mockery, you can answer with a new one, or ignore it, as since
it's a mockery people don't _expect_ you to answer it either.

  I can understand that it's a personal and very subjective matter.
Though I also think that bearing mockery is one of the many aspect of
self-reassessment and that flaming the mocker is more a way to dodge the
underlying question than anything else.  And if you allow me to be a bit
pedantic, political systems that disallowed pamphlets and other
satirical tracts were not really regimes I would like to live under.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgp8oNxPb_559.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: