Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:48:26 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200703050048.26375.elendil@planet.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20070304233121.GM18177@patate.is-a-geek.org>
References: <[🔎] 20070304214321.GE11168@yellowpig> <[🔎] 200703050023.05386.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20070304233121.GM18177@patate.is-a-geek.org>

On Monday 05 March 2007 00:32, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm not sure why you say they could not do that.  AFAICS it would have
> involved a list of keys to block instead of a list of keys to allow, and
> removing a "not" in a test, which doesn't seem all that complicated.

OK. I may be wrong about that. I did not really look into the technical side 
of it. Does not really affect the main points of my message though.

Attachment: pgpOKNhwZcoGO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Next by Date: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Previous by thread: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Next by thread: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread