Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:27:08 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20070305012708.GB13090@scowler.net>
Mail-followup-to: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200703050023.05386.elendil@planet.nl>
References: <[🔎] 20070304214321.GE11168@yellowpig> <[🔎] 200703050023.05386.elendil@planet.nl>

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:22:55AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> As I personally feel that this GR is a misplaced attempt from the 
> disgruntled DDs to get their way, I have voted for "further discussion".

I personally feel that the changes to dak were a misplaced attempt by
the ftp-team to get its way.  How should I vote on this issue?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>

References:
- Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
- Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Questions to the candidates
Next by Date: Re: Question to the candidates: inclusion of the kFreeBSD-* ports
Previous by thread: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Next by thread: Re: Summary for the upload package rules GR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread