On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:28:24AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > So propose something that implements it, rather than implementing > something different and then saying we can change it later. It's always > easier to change things before they start. At some point you have to actually start however. We've already had over a year of changing things and doing nothing. > You seem to believe this is a feature, but to me, this is a serious bug. > If we're voting for the proposal on the basis that all it creates is a > governance structure [...] There isn't a governance structure. There's a keyring, a way of using it, and a way that any DD can get people into it, and out of it. How that ends up working out is something for Debian to work out in practice. > I can see voting for something that says "we empower the DAM and FD to People sure like giving the DAM and FD lots of power. I guess because they've used it so effectively to date. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature