On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > The easiest way to avoid that problem would be to require a new field in > > the package "DM-Upload: okay" to allow DM uploads, as well as an entry > > in the Maintainer:/Uploaders: field. [...] > Agreed. However, you need to check that field on the latest version in the > target suite of the upload and not in the .dsc upload. The proposal was to check based the Maintainer/Uploader field of the previous .dsc upload to unstable/experimental, and presumably doing the same thing for the DM-Upload-Allowed: field (or whatever it's called). > (This doesn't address the case of multiple DM listed in Uploaders but it's > certainly not a case that I'd worry about) It doesn't allow for some people to be listed in the "Maintainer:" or "Uploaders:" field of a "DM-Upload: okay" package who aren't allowed to maintain and upload the package... Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature